Electronic Displays as Trademark Specimens
ATTORNEYS IN DALLAS
Understand the importance of submitting proper specimens for trademark registration, including electronic displays, and learn about the requirements for acceptable specimens, whether traditional or digital, to establish the mark's use in commerce as a source identifier.
Electronic Displays as Trademark Specimens
Specimens must be submitted to the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) for examination by Examining Attorneys before a trademark can be registered. A specimen serves as evidence of how the applicant is using the trademark in commerce in connection with the goods or services. It should clearly indicate the mark as a source identifier.
With the rise of the Internet, trademark rules have evolved to include electronic displays as acceptable specimens. However, traditional rules still apply, such as the requirement that a display must be directly associated with the goods being offered for sale (see the Trademark Manual Of Examining Procedure, or TMEP, Section 904.03(g)). Additionally, the trademark must be prominently displayed on the electronic display. Various methods can be employed to distinguish the mark on a webpage, such as: (1) using a larger font size for the mark compared to other text; (2) presenting the mark in a distinct stylization or color from the rest of the page's content; (3) featuring the mark in bold type alongside an image or description of the goods; and (4) utilizing the "tm" symbol with the applied mark and positioning it at the top of the webpage. These factors are not definitive, and the webpage as a whole must be evaluated.
Traditional displays encompass point of sale materials like banners, window displays, menus, catalogs (only if they include a picture or description of the relevant goods and ordering information), shelf-talkers, or even infomercials. In the digital era, displays include web pages. For online environments, electronic displays must meet the same standards (refer to TMEP 904.03(i) for further details).
Display Must Capture Attention of Purchasing Consumers
Whether a display is of a traditional or electronic nature, it should capture the attention of potential consumers and motivate them to purchase the goods or services. A webpage qualifies as an electronic display if it is associated with the goods, contains an image or adequate textual description of the goods, and demonstrates how to order the goods. Additionally, consumers must recognize the term displayed on the webpage as a trademark. If the mark appears in ordinary text or is perceived as conveying information rather than acting as a source identifier, the USPTO may reject the specimen. It is also acceptable to submit a webpage from a third-party seller to demonstrate the use of the mark, as long as it meets the criteria of a display specimen.
Display Must Go Beyond Mere Advertisement or Promotional Material
A display must go beyond mere advertisement or promotional material. For example, an advertisement only provides information and does not offer a means to purchase the goods or services. Indicators of the ability to purchase may include an order form, shopping cart feature, or contact information for placing an order. Whether a webpage display meets the specimen requirements is determined by the Examining Attorney assigned to review the trademark application.
The burden of proof rests with the applicant to demonstrate that the webpage meets the criteria outlined in the TMEP. If the ordering information is not visible on the submitted webpage, the applicant may need to provide additional webpages as part of the specimen and offer an explanation for the Examiner to understand how users can order the product. If the webpage lacks an image of the goods, it must sufficiently describe the goods so that their features and prominent characteristics are recognizable in the text.
Distinct requirements exist for marks used to brand goods and those serving as source indicators for services. The perception of the ordinary consumer will be a crucial factor. Another consideration is whether the mark is the sole trademark on the page associated with the goods.
- 66(a) Applications
- Abandoning a Trademark Application or Withdrawing a TTAB Proceeding
- Abandonment and Nonuse
- Abbreviations as Trademarks
- Accelerated Case Resolutions
- Acquired Secondary Trademark Meaning
- Amending Trademark Application
- Assigning a Trademark
- Assigning a Trademark and the Intent to Use Application
- Avoiding Fraud on Trademark Applications
- Avoiding Trademark Litigation
- Basis for Filing a Trademark
- Benefits of Registering a Trademark
- Bona Fide Intent to Use
- Celebrity Trademarks
- Challenging the Relatedness Factor
- Challenging Trademark Rights
- Claims in a Notice of Opposition
- Co-Existence Agreements
- Common Law Trademarks in the Internet Era
- Common Law Use and Priority
- Conflicting Marks
- Consent Agreements
- Constructive Use Priority
- Dates of Use
- Defenses in Opposition and Cancellation Proceedings
- Descriptive or Generic Trademarks
- Design Marks
- Design Trademarks
- Determining Trademark Similarities
- Discovery in TTAB Proceedings
- Dividing a Trademark Application
- Drawing Page
- Electronic Display Specimens for Trademarks
- Evidence in TTAB Proceedings
- Evidence of Acquired Distinctiveness
- Expediting Trademark Cancellation for Nonuse or Abandonment
- Extending Time to Oppose
- Factors of a Likelihood of Confusion Analysis
- False Suggestions of Connection
- Famous Trademarks and Likelihood of Confusion and Dilution
- Filing an Opposition or Cancellation Proceedings
- First Sale Doctrine
- Five Years of Use
- Foreign Trademark Rights
- Generic Trademarks
- Geographic Trademarks
- Hiring Trademark Counsel
- Immoral and Scandalous Trademarks
- Incontestability of U.S. Trademarks
- International Trademark Filings
- Joint Trademark Ownership
- Lawful Use of a Trademark in Commerce
- Likelihood of Confusion Analysis
- Likelihood of Confusion Refusal
- Merely Descriptive Trademarks
- Multiple Bases for a Trademark Application
- Overcoming and Ornamentation Trademark Refusal
- Personal Name Trademarks
- Principal and Supplemental Registers
- Protecting Single Creative Works
- Recording Trademark Assignments
- Refusal of a Trademark
- Refusing a Trade Dress Application
- Registering a Certification Trademark
- Registering a Service Mark
- Registering a Trademark That Lacks Inherent Distinctiveness
- Registering an International Trademark
- Relatedness of Goods or Services
- Request for Reconsideration in Trademark Office Action
- Requirements for International Trademark Application
- Revive an Abandoned Trademark Application
- Secondary Meaning
- Source Confusion
- Special Trademark Applications
- Standard Character and Special Format Marks
- Standing in Opposition and Cancellation Proceedings
- State Trademark Registration
- Statement of Use Extensions
- Tacking Doctrine
- Technical Trademark Use
- The Supplemental Register
- Trade Dress
- Trade Dress Application
- Trademark Application
- Trademark Clearance Searches
- Trademark Disclaimers
- Trademark Licensing
- Trademark of Authors, Performing Artists, and Characters
- Trademark Ownership
- Trademark Protection In Texas
- Trademark Settlements
- Trademark Specimens
- Trademark Specimens
- Trademark Use by Related Company
- Trademark Use in Advertising
- Trademark Use in Commerce
- Trademarking a Distinctive Mark
- Trademarking a Hashtag
- Trademarks for Musical Artists
- TTAB Discovery Rules
- TTAB Proceedings
- U.S. Service Mark
- U.S. Trade Dress
- Understanding Trade Channels
- Unitary U.S. Trademark
- Universal Symbols as Trademarks
- Using Secondary Sources
- What is an Ex Parte Appeal?
- Where to Register a Trademark
- Who Must File a Trademark?
Contact an Experienced Trademark Attorney
If you need legal advice regarding your trademark rights, assistance with trademark prosecution, or representation in a domain name dispute, contact Wilson Whitaker Rynell. Our team of trademark lawyers has extensive experience in all aspects of trademark and copyright law, including the filing of trademark applications and representing clients in defense or prosecution before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
CLIENT MATTERS
5,000+
YEARS OF SERVICE
25+
Award Winning
Recognized in the legal industry as dedicated board-certified lawyers and Rising Stars.
Expert Team
Your project will be handled by legal experts every time. You will have the most experienced attorneys working for you.
Quality Representation
