Resolving Trademark Disputes Without Litigation
ATTORNEYS IN DALLAS
Explore the power of written agreements to navigate trademark conflicts effectively, potentially avoiding litigation, securing registrations, and ensuring clarity in trademark prosecution..
Resolving Trademark Disputes Without Litigation
When conflicts arise between trademark owners, it is advisable for them to explore different forms of written agreements that can address their specific concerns. By entering into a Consent Agreement, Concurrent Use Agreement, Coexistence Agreement, or Licensing Agreement, trademark owners can potentially avoid costly litigation expenses and the uncertainty of court outcomes. Furthermore, these agreements can serve as valuable evidence in trademark prosecution proceedings at the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) or in proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB).
Consent Agreements
In fact, the main appellate court overseeing the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) has explicitly emphasized the significance of these agreements, particularly consent agreements. For further insights into the Federal Circuit Court's stance on this matter, refer to Bongrain International v. Delice de France, 811 F.2d 1479 1 USPQ2d 1775, 1778 (Fed. Cir. 1988). According to the Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure, a Consent Agreement is defined as an agreement between two parties where one party consents to the registration of a trademark by the other party, or where both parties consent to the use of identical or similar trademarks (TMEP §1207.01(d)(viii)).
Such evidence can be highly persuasive when challenging a refusal to register at the USPTO. As demonstrated in In re Four Seasons Hotel Ltd., 26 U.S.P.Q.2d 1071, 1074 (Fed. Cir. 1993), the Federal Circuit Court stated that, in the absence of conflicting evidence, a Consent Agreement serves as proof that there is no likelihood of confusion. However, for a Consent Agreement to be valid, it must not be a mere "naked Consent Agreement." A naked agreement occurs when one party simply consents to the registration or use of the trademark without providing an explanation as to why it would not lead to confusion. A credible Consent Agreement will conclusively demonstrate that simultaneous use of the two trademarks will not result in consumer confusion. This is often due to the lack of close relationship between the goods or services or the presence of different trade channels. Future disputes are typically not addressed in a Consent Agreement since the primary objective is to secure trademark registration.
Concurrent Use Agreements
Concurrent Use Agreements are established when two parties are utilizing similar or identical trademarks for similar or identical goods or services, but they mutually agree to restrict their usage to specific geographic areas. In such cases, an applicant can seek a trademark registration with a geographic limitation at the USPTO. By imposing this geographical restriction, the potential for confusion in the marketplace is effectively minimized. These agreements commonly arise in the context of trademark prosecutions.
Coexistence Agreements
Coexistence Agreements come into play when two parties possess trademark rights in separate geographic regions or for unrelated goods or services. These agreements may face rejection by a court if it determines that they fail to prevent consumer confusion. Typically, such situations arise during scenarios like mergers or acquisitions, product line expansions, or geographic expansions. One drawback of these agreements is the potential dilution of the trademark, as enforcing intellectual property rights against third parties might become more challenging when allowing mark usage under a Coexistence Agreement. Complex issues must be addressed within the agreement, including restrictions on internet sales, ownership of domain names, limitations on adopting new derivative word marks, proving abandonment of rights, and determining the party with the right to enforce the mark against third parties.
- 66(a) Applications
- Abandoning a Trademark Application or Withdrawing a TTAB Proceeding
- Abandonment and Nonuse
- Abbreviations as Trademarks
- Accelerated Case Resolutions
- Acquired Secondary Trademark Meaning
- Amending Trademark Application
- Assigning a Trademark
- Assigning a Trademark and the Intent to Use Application
- Avoiding Fraud on Trademark Applications
- Avoiding Trademark Litigation
- Basis for Filing a Trademark
- Benefits of Registering a Trademark
- Bona Fide Intent to Use
- Celebrity Trademarks
- Challenging the Relatedness Factor
- Challenging Trademark Rights
- Claims in a Notice of Opposition
- Co-Existence Agreements
- Common Law Trademarks in the Internet Era
- Common Law Use and Priority
- Conflicting Marks
- Consent Agreements
- Constructive Use Priority
- Dates of Use
- Defenses in Opposition and Cancellation Proceedings
- Descriptive or Generic Trademarks
- Design Marks
- Design Trademarks
- Determining Trademark Similarities
- Discovery in TTAB Proceedings
- Dividing a Trademark Application
- Drawing Page
- Electronic Display Specimens for Trademarks
- Evidence in TTAB Proceedings
- Evidence of Acquired Distinctiveness
- Expediting Trademark Cancellation for Nonuse or Abandonment
- Extending Time to Oppose
- Factors of a Likelihood of Confusion Analysis
- False Suggestions of Connection
- Famous Trademarks and Likelihood of Confusion and Dilution
- Filing an Opposition or Cancellation Proceedings
- First Sale Doctrine
- Five Years of Use
- Foreign Trademark Rights
- Generic Trademarks
- Geographic Trademarks
- Hiring Trademark Counsel
- Immoral and Scandalous Trademarks
- Incontestability of U.S. Trademarks
- International Trademark Filings
- Joint Trademark Ownership
- Lawful Use of a Trademark in Commerce
- Likelihood of Confusion Analysis
- Likelihood of Confusion Refusal
- Merely Descriptive Trademarks
- Multiple Bases for a Trademark Application
- Overcoming and Ornamentation Trademark Refusal
- Personal Name Trademarks
- Principal and Supplemental Registers
- Protecting Single Creative Works
- Recording Trademark Assignments
- Refusal of a Trademark
- Refusing a Trade Dress Application
- Registering a Certification Trademark
- Registering a Service Mark
- Registering a Trademark That Lacks Inherent Distinctiveness
- Registering an International Trademark
- Relatedness of Goods or Services
- Request for Reconsideration in Trademark Office Action
- Requirements for International Trademark Application
- Revive an Abandoned Trademark Application
- Secondary Meaning
- Source Confusion
- Special Trademark Applications
- Standard Character and Special Format Marks
- Standing in Opposition and Cancellation Proceedings
- State Trademark Registration
- Statement of Use Extensions
- Tacking Doctrine
- Technical Trademark Use
- The Supplemental Register
- Trade Dress
- Trade Dress Application
- Trademark Application
- Trademark Clearance Searches
- Trademark Disclaimers
- Trademark Licensing
- Trademark of Authors, Performing Artists, and Characters
- Trademark Ownership
- Trademark Protection In Texas
- Trademark Settlements
- Trademark Specimens
- Trademark Specimens
- Trademark Use by Related Company
- Trademark Use in Advertising
- Trademark Use in Commerce
- Trademarking a Distinctive Mark
- Trademarking a Hashtag
- Trademarks for Musical Artists
- TTAB Discovery Rules
- TTAB Proceedings
- U.S. Service Mark
- U.S. Trade Dress
- Understanding Trade Channels
- Unitary U.S. Trademark
- Universal Symbols as Trademarks
- Using Secondary Sources
- What is an Ex Parte Appeal?
- Where to Register a Trademark
- Who Must File a Trademark?
License Agreements
Unlike the aforementioned types of trademark agreements, a License Agreement permits the usage of a single trademark, with only one trademark owner (the licensor) and the mark serving as an indicator for a sole source. The key element of any License Agreement is the licensor's ability to maintain control over the quality of the licensee's goods or services. The license may involve a royalty based on a percentage of sales or could be royalty-free. When drafting a License Agreement, it is crucial to exercise caution and ensure that the provisions are sufficiently specific, allowing a court to interpret and enforce the license effectively.
Contact an Experienced Trademark Attorney
If you need legal advice regarding your trademark rights, assistance with trademark prosecution, or representation in a domain name dispute, contact Wilson Whitaker Rynell. Our team of trademark lawyers has extensive experience in all aspects of trademark and copyright law, including the filing of trademark applications and representing clients in defense or prosecution before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
CLIENT MATTERS
5,000+
YEARS OF SERVICE
25+
Award Winning
Recognized in the legal industry as dedicated board-certified lawyers and Rising Stars.
Expert Team
Your project will be handled by legal experts every time. You will have the most experienced attorneys working for you.
Quality Representation
