Copyright Law And Your Original Works Of Authorship
John Wilson • March 30, 2019
Exclusive Rights To You Literary And Musical Works
Copyright law protects “original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression,” including literary works; musical works and any accompanying words; dramatic works and any accompanying music; pantomimes and choreographic works; pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works; motion pictures and other audiovisual works; sound records; and architectural works. However, copyright protection does not extend to a mere idea or concept, regardless of the manner in which it is embodied in the work. Our Dallas copyright attorneys can assist you in filing and protecting your copyrights. For more information on copyrights, see our Copyright Practice
web page.
What Are The Exclusive Rights Of A Copyright Owner?
Depending on the medium of the copyrighted work, a copyright owner enjoys the exclusive rights to do and to authorize the following with the copyrighted work:
(i) reproduce the copyrighted work;(ii) prepare derivative works based thereon;(iii) distribute copies of the copyrighted work;(iv) perform publicly (via digital audio transmission or otherwise); and (v) display publicly.17 U.S.C. § 106(1)-(6).
Anyone who violates any of these exclusive rights may be liable for infringement, provided the owner can prove (i) ownership of a valid copyright, and (ii) copying of protected elements of the copyrighted work. Copying is often proved by showing that the accused infringer’s work is strikingly similar to the protected elements of the copyrighted work. See Ferguson v. Nat'l Broad. Co., Inc., 584 F.2d 111, 113 (5th Cir. 1978); see also Creations Unlimited, Inc. v. McCain, 112 F.3d 814, 816 (5th Cir. 1997) (“To determine whether an instance of copying is legally actionable, a side-by-side comparison must be made between the original and the copy to determine whether a layman would view the two works as ‘substantially similar.’”)
Fair Use Analysis For Copyright Infringement
There are, however, limitations on the exclusive rights enjoyed by a copyright owner, one of which is fair use. Although most commonly found in teaching, news reporting, commentary, criticism, and research, whether "fair use" excuses what would otherwise amount to copyright infringement is ultimately determined by analyzing the following factors:
- the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
- the nature of the copyrighted work;
- the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
- the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
See 17 U.S.C. § 107 (“[T]he fair use of a copyrighted work . . . is not an infringement of copyright.”).
Proving Copyright Infringement
While copyright infringement can be rebutted by proof of independent development, copyright infringement is strict liability — there is no intent or scienter requirement (i.e., one need not have the intent or knowledge of copying). For instance, in some jurisdictions infringement is shown by ownership of copyright, access to work (generally) and substantial similarity. In another jurisdiction, infringement can be shown by ownership of a copyright and by proof of “actionable copying” or “factual copying” and proof that such sufficiently render the two works “substantially similar” or “virtually identical,” depending.
In order for an entity or person to prove copyright infringement, certain evidence must be found supporting the infringement:
- Direct evidence of copying; or
- Inference of copying, which is drawn when (i) defendant had access to copyrighted work, and (ii) accused work is substantially similar to copyrighted works (or “virtually identical” in some cases).
A substantial similarity test would ordinarily ask whether the average lay observer would recognize the defendant’s work as having been appropriated from the copyrighted work. See Warner Bros. Inc. v. ABC, Inc., 654 F.2d 204, 208 (2d Cir. 1981). A virtual identicality test applies to compilations or works consisting largely of uncopyrightable elements and would ask i) whether the two works are “virtually identical;” ii) whether there has been “bodily appropriation of expression;” or iii) “copying of substantially the entire item.” See Apple Computer, 1nc. v. Microsoft Corp., 821 F.Supp. 616, 623 (N.D. Cal. 1993), aff’d 35 F.3d 1435 (9th Cir. 1994). Virtual identicality is also required where similarities follow from the fact that both parties’ works are realistic depictions of natural objects. A full discussion of all potential tests is beyond the scope of this brief; however, this article is intended to give a basic understanding.
What Cannot Be Copyrighted?
While copyright law may protect your original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium, there are certain subject matters which can never be copyrighted:
- an idea – expression “dichotomy” between idea and the expression of the idea;
- merger doctrine – means of expressing an idea is very limited;
- scenes a faire – a common standard expression within a genre;
- functional elements of a concept;
- certain facts which are scientific or universal; and
- public domain materials.
Explore the Texas Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (TUFTA) and its role in safeguarding business partnerships from asset mismanagement and financial disputes. Practical steps to protect your interests with insights from Wilson Whitaker Rynell, a Texas law firm specializing in complex commercial litigation.
Texas' new S.B. 2794 "Three Strikes" law, effective Sept 2025, fights child visitation denials in Dallas, Plano, Frisco, and DFW. Learn how Wilson Whitaker Rynell helps enforce custody orders and secure remedies.
Wilson Legal Group P.C. proudly recognizes John T. Wilson, Leigh Whitaker, and Kayla Holderman for their 2025 Texas Super Lawyers and Rising Stars selections, showcasing their dedication to legal excellence.
Learn when a verified denial is required in a Texas lawsuit under TRCP 93. Wilson Whitaker Rynell, a Dallas law firm, explains key scenarios, consequences, and case law to protect your defense. Contact us at 972-248-8080.
Need an aggressive divorce lawyer in DFW? Board-Certified attorney with a proven track record in high-asset division & custody across Dallas, Collin, Denton & Tarrant.
Learn about minority shareholder rights in Texas, including suing for corporate dissolution under TBOC § 11.404. Explore rehabilitative receivership, close corporation remedies, LLC dissolution standards, and supporting claims like breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, and inspection rights.
Texas horse contract law: what to include in sale, lease, boarding, training & breeding agreements. Protect your investment—work with a Texas equine attorney.
Challenge Texas personal jurisdiction with a Rule 120a special appearance. Learn how to challenge Texas personal jurisdiction with a Rule 120a special appearance, what counts as “minimum contacts,” and why emails, payments, or a single contract often aren’t enough.
Need to remove a member or exit an LLC in Texas? Wilson Legal Group P.C. drafts buyouts, resolves disputes, and ensures compliance with the TBOC.
The Wilson Legal Group are Dallas attorneys that specializes in Patents, Trademarks, Copyrights, Trade Secrets, Complex Litigation, Business/Corporate Law, Family Law and Real Estate Law. At the Wilson Legal Group, our clients are our focus. Our philosophy is simple and straight-forward: Understand our clients' needs, hopes, and interests in order to help them flourish. Our staff strives to build strong relationships with our clients in order to appreciate their best interests and help them achieve their goals.
Have an idea for a blog? Click and request a blog and we will let you know when we post it!
