a blue and orange check mark with the letter w on it as the Wilson Whitaker Rynell Logo

Can a Parent Record a Child’s Phone Calls in Texas?

John Wilson • July 23, 2025

Can a Parent Record a Child’s Phone Calls in Texas?

Understanding Texas Wiretap Laws for Recording Phone Calls

In Texas, intercepting phone calls is governed by strict laws designed to protect privacy. According to the Texas Penal Code, Section 16.02(c)(4)(A)(B), the interception of telephone calls is prohibited unless:

  • "The person is a party to the communication," or
  • "One of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to the interception."

This blog will explore how Texas courts interpret consent, particularly in cases involving minors and their parents, and what exceptions might apply.


Is Texas a One-Party Consent State?

Yes. Texas is a one-party consent state.

Under Texas Penal Code §16.02, it is legal to record a conversation if at least one party to the conversation consents. That means:

  • If you’re part of the conversation, you can record it without telling the other person.
  • You do not need to notify or get permission from the other party, as long as you are involved in the conversation.
  • Parents may also give vicarious consent to record their child’s conversation if they believe it is necessary for the child's welfare.

This rule applies to most phone calls and in-person conversations—but there are some exceptions.


Recording Conversations Across State Lines

If you’re recording a conversation where other participants are located in different states, things get more complicated. Some states require all-party consent, meaning every participant must agree before a conversation is legally recorded.

To stay compliant:

  • Always obtain consent from out-of-state parties before recording.
  • Consult an attorney if you’re unsure whether the other state’s laws require all-party consent.


Can I Record My Conversations with My Co-Parent?

The short answer is: maybe. Once you determine which consent law your state follows, you may be able to record conversations and phone calls—as long as you comply with your state’s specific legal requirements. Thorough research may be necessary to confirm whether both state and federal laws protect your actions. Before recording conversations with your co-parent without their knowledge, confirm that you are in a one-party consent state and review your state’s guidelines to ensure the recording is legal. If you are in an all-party consent state, you must notify your co-parent each time you wish to record conversations—whether in person or over the phone. The same rules apply even if your children are on a call with their other parent. In any case, it’s best to consult a family law attorney to ensure your actions are legal and your recordings will be admissible in court.


Vicarious Consent Doctrine for Recording Minors

The State of Texas has not expressly adopted or rejected the vicarious consent doctrine, but it was initially acknowledged by courts in other states, such as in Pollock v. Pollock (Florida, 1998) and Campiti v. Walonis (Massachusetts, 1983). Texas courts may look to these decisions for guidance, especially in family law or child custody disputes. In practice, some Texas courts have allowed recordings made by a parent under this doctrine when the recording was reasonably believed to be necessary for:

  • Protecting the child from abuse or neglect
  • Gathering evidence of parental alienation
  • Monitoring safety during visitation

However, courts are cautious and will evaluate:

  • The reasonableness of the parent’s belief
  • Whether the recording was truly necessary
  • Whether less intrusive alternatives were available


Parental Consent In Phone Calls and Vicarious Consent Doctrine

The issue of whether a parent can give consent on behalf of their child has been a subject of significant legal discussion. In the Texas case of Alameda v. State 235 S.W.3d 218 (2007), the court adopted this doctrine that considered the vicarious consent doctrine, allowing parents to consent to the recording of their child’s phone calls as long as they have a “good faith, objectively reasonable basis” to believe that recording is in the child’s best interest.. The mother in this case recorded her child’s phone conversations with the father, suspecting that the father was emotionally abusive. The court held that the mother’s belief that the recordings were in her child’s best interest was objectively reasonable. As a result, the recording was admitted into evidence, and the mother’s vicarious consent was deemed valid. Although vicarious-consent is not listed as an exception to the Texas wiretap law, the court of appeals held that, in order to protect a child, a parent may record her child's telephone conversations if the recording meets the standards in The court of appeals considered the factors outlined in Pollock v. Pollock, 154 F.3d 601 (6th Cir.1998): "... a parent may give vicarious-consent to record a child's telephone conversations if the parent has a good-faith basis for believing that recording is in the best interest of the child."


The Texas Family Code supports this approach, granting parents the statutory right to make decisions that are in the best interest of their child, including protection and care (Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 151.001):

Sec. 151.001.  RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF PARENT. 

(a)  A parent of a child has the following rights and duties:

(1)  the right to have physical possession, to direct the moral and religious training, and to designate the residence of the child;

(2)  the duty of care, control, protection, and reasonable discipline of the child...



Recording a Child’s Conversations with a Parent

In Allen v. Mancini, the father recorded phone calls between his daughter, L.M.M., and the child’s mother without the child's or mother’s knowledge. The father, who was a joint managing conservator, argued that he had the right to consent to the recording on behalf of his daughter. The court agreed, finding that as a conservator, the father had the authority to make significant decisions for his child, including consenting to the recordings. This case emphasizes that joint managing conservators have broad authority to make decisions on behalf of their children, including matters relating to medical, psychological, and even privacy concerns. The court ruled that the father’s actions were within his rights as a conservator, and the recordings were properly admitted into evidence .It confirmed that under both Texas and federal law, a managing conservator may consent to the recording of their child’s conversation when done in the child’s best interest. This decision reinforces the vicarious consent doctrine in Texas, particularly in family law contexts, allowing parents to authorize recordings involving their minor children under certain circumstance:


"The tape recording was made with the consent of Mancini who was a party to some of the conversations on the tape. Seymour v. Gillespie, 608 S.W.2d 897 (Tex.1980); Kotrla v. Kotrla, 718 S.W.2d 853 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1986, writ ref'd n.r.e.). Mancini also served as joint managing conservator of L.M.M. at the time the conversations were recorded between L.M.M. and Allen. As managing conservator, Mancini had the authority to consent to medical, dental, surgical, psychiatric, and psychological treatment and also to marriage or enlistment in the armed forces of the United States. We find that Mancini also had the authority to consent on behalf of L.M.M. to the tape recording of conversations between L.M.M. and Allen."


Practical Guidance for Parents Recording Child Phone Calls

If you are considering recording your child’s phone calls, particularly if the conversation involves a co-parent, it’s crucial to consult with a family law attorney. The legal landscape can be complex, and violating privacy laws can result in the exclusion of important evidence or even criminal charges. An attorney can help you navigate Texas wiretap laws and advise whether you have grounds for vicarious consent based on your child’s best interests. The vicarious consent doctrine gives parents some leeway in recording their child’s phone conversations under Texas law, but only when they have a good-faith, reasonable belief that it is in the child’s best interest. Courts have repeatedly affirmed that parents acting within their legal rights, such as joint managing conservators, can give consent on behalf of their children. However, this is a legally sensitive area, and parents should always seek legal guidance before making such decisions.


Texas courts have consistently held that parents can vicariously consent to the recording of their minor child’s conversations if they have a reasonable, good-faith belief that it is necessary and in the child’s best interest. In cases where abuse, neglect, or other concerns are present, courts are more likely to side with the parent recording the conversation.


PARENTS SHOULD BE CAUTIOUS WHEN RECORDING CONVERSATIONS INVOLVING THEIR CHILD, ESPECIALLY WHEN THE OTHER PARTY IS UNAWARE OF THE RECORDING. ALTHOUGH TEXAS ALLOWS RECORDINGS IF ONE PARTY CONSENTS, RECORDING WITHOUT CONSENT CAN VIOLATE WIRETAP LAWS, LEADING TO LEGAL CONSEQUENCES.

PARENTAL CALL RECORDING FAQS

  • Is Texas a one-party consent state for recording phone calls?

    Yes. Texas is a one-party consent state, meaning it is legal to record a conversation if at least one party involved consents to the recording. 


    Under Texas Penal Code §16.02(c)(4)(A), if you are part of the conversation, you can legally record it without telling the other person. However, you cannot record a conversation between other people unless one of them has given prior consent.

  • Can a parent record their child’s phone conversations in Texas?

    In many cases, yes. Texas courts have upheld the vicarious consent doctrine, which allows a parent to record a child’s conversation if they have a good-faith, objectively reasonable belief that doing so is in the child’s best interest.


    For example, in Alameda v. State (2007), a court admitted recordings a mother made of her child’s phone calls with the father, citing emotional abuse concerns.

  • What is the vicarious consent doctrine under Texas law?

    The vicarious consent doctrine allows a parent to legally consent on behalf of their minor child to record conversations—without notifying the other party—if:

    • The parent has a good-faith belief the recording is necessary.
    • The recording is done to protect the child (e.g., from abuse or harm).

    Texas courts have not adopted this doctrine by statute, but have followed it in family law cases, particularly where the child’s safety or welfare is in question.

  • Can you record your child’s conversation with the other parent during a custody dispute?

    Potentially, yes—but proceed with caution. In cases like Allen v. Mancini (2005), Texas courts allowed a joint managing conservator to consent to recording conversations between the child and the other parent. The recording was deemed lawful because the father had the authority to make decisions in the child’s best interest.


    Always consult a family law attorney to determine whether your situation meets the legal threshold for vicarious consent.

  • Are recordings made under vicarious consent admissible in court?

    Yes, if done properly. Recordings may be admitted into evidence if the court finds:


    • The parent had a reasonable belief the recording was necessary.
    • The child’s best interest was the primary motivation.

    Courts will consider whether less intrusive alternatives were available and whether the parent was acting within their rights under the Texas Family Code §151.001, which includes the duty of care, protection, and discipline.

  • What happens if the conversation involves someone in another state?

    Recording laws vary by state. While Texas only requires one-party consent, some states—like California or Florida—require all-party consent. If you’re in Texas but the other party is in an all-party consent state:


    • Get explicit consent from all participants before recording.
    • Otherwise, you risk violating federal or out-of-state wiretap laws, which may carry criminal or civil penalties

    When in doubt, get everyone’s permission or talk to an attorney before recording interstate calls.

  • What are the risks of recording conversations without proper consent in Texas?

    Recording without proper consent in Texas may lead to:


    • Criminal charges under the Texas Penal Code §16.02.
    • Civil lawsuits for invasion of privacy or unlawful interception.
    • Suppression of evidence in family law cases if recordings are deemed illegal

     To avoid legal issues:


    • Only record if you’re a party to the conversation or have vicarious consent as a parent.
    • Seek legal advice before recording conversations involving your child or another adult.


Schedule a Consultation with a Child Custody Attorney Today!


Dallas Office: (972) 248-8080


Our family law legal team is ready to help you through child custody
or divorce with professionalism & care.


Call us today to get started.


A person is holding up their hands with the words yes and no written on them.

How to Overcome a Final Trademark Rejection

By Chelsea Lankford • July 3, 2025
How to Overcome a Final Trademark Rejection: Your Guide to Saving Your Brand
A model house , keys , coins and money on a table.

Civil Asset Forfeiture in Texas

By John Wilson • June 19, 2025
Civil Asset Forfeiture in Texas: How Your Company Could Be at Risk—and How a Law Firm Can Help
A bartender is pouring whiskey into a glass at a bar.

Navigating Texas TABC Administrative Proceedings

By John Wilson • May 6, 2025
TABC Administrative Proceedings in Texas 
Man kissing pregnant belly.

Texas Senate Passes Bill Requiring Retroactive Child Support from Date of Conception

By Chelsea Lankford • April 10, 2025
Texas Senate Passes Bill Requiring Retroactive Child Support from Date of Conception
A person is holding a cell phone in front of a book titled artificial intelligence

Copyright and Translated Content: Who Owns the Creative Rights?

By John Wilson • February 19, 2025
Copyright and Translated Content: Who Owns the Creative Rights? Understanding Copyright Law and Translation Copyright law protects creative work and bestows sole authority over the work upon the creators. For example, the owner of the work of a novel has the right over the work under the concept of the right under the copyright. Courts have found that “the degree of protection afforded by the copyright is measured by what is actually copyrightable in the publication and not by the entire publication.” See, e.g., Dorsey v. Old Sur. Life Ins. Co., 98 F.2d 872, 873 (10th Cir. 1938) (emphasis added). For translations, the situation is not very clear. Translations involve creative judgments over word translation and not the translation of mere words. Hence the knowledge about the applicability of the concept of the right over the work is essential for establishing the right over the work. For example, a Court in the Northern District of California stated that: “ the determinative question is whether Plaintiff holds a valid copyright. ” Signo Trading Intern. Ltd. v. Gordon, 535 F. Supp. 362, 363 (N.D. Cal. 1981). The Signo Trading Court dismissed Plaintiff’s infringement claims because plaintiff did not have a valid copyright as a matter of law in the translations and transliterations at issue because they lacked the “requisite originality.” Id. at 365. Can Translation Be Considered a Creative Process? The Practice of Translating Translation goes beyond the replacement of one word by the equivalent word from the source text. Translating literary work, poetry, and fiction with deeper meanings beyond the surface text is a complex, artistic process. Translating books like The Iliad, for instance, requires the practice of artistic translation to translate the emotions, thoughts, and the culture correctly. Technical Translations and Legal Translations Conversely, technical writing and texts for the law need less creativity and instead value correctness over all else. These writing forms require strict adherence to the original sense, leaving very little room for artistic interpretation. Translations for these writing forms thus typically involve less creative contribution and less potential for the work being protected by copyright. Why Is Creativity Important for Translations for Copyright? Originality when translating For a work to be subject to copyright, some creativity, however slight, is essential. Even when the translation is taken from the work, the translation also includes some creative work by the translator. This creativity can make the translation subject to copyright. A derivative work must “recast, transform[], or adapt[]” a preexisting work and “consist[] of editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship.” Id. In other words, it must change or alter the pre-existing work’s content and must itself be an original work of authorship. The Supreme Court stated that “ [t]he sine qua non of copyright is originality ” and that “ [t]o qualify for copyright protection, a work must be original to the author. ” Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., Inc., 499 U.S. 340, 361 (1991) at 345. “Original, as the term is used in copyright, means only that the work was independently created by the author (as opposed to copied from other works), and that it possesses at least some minimal degree of creativity.” Id. (citing 1 M. Nimmer & D. Nimmer, Copyright §§ 2.01[A], [B] (1990)). In granting a Rule 12 motion to dismiss, the Signo Trading Court held that: " It is inconceivable that anyone could copyright a single word or a commonly used short phrase, in any language. It is also inconceivable that a valid copyright could be obtained for a phonetic spelling, using standard Roman letters, of such words or phrases. Although lists of words and translations of larger works may be copyrightable, Plaintiff cannot claim credit for any of the elements which make those things copyrightable. For these reasons, Plaintiff does not hold a valid copyright on the translations or transliterations ... " Signo Trading, 535 F. Supp. at 365. The Problem of the Derivative Work However, translations are generally "derivative works" - derived from the work of another. Because of this, the owner or author of the work is generally required to agree to the translation. Translations made illegally can be held under the classification of copyright violations, even when the translator has added creative elements. Who Has the Right over the Translated Work? Employer-Commissioned Translations Ownership of the copyright for the translation work varies. If the translation is commissioned by the owner of the original work, the owner will retain the right. Even when the translator adds creativity by passing over the original emotions and thoughts, the owner will not necessarily lose the right over the translation work. In some circumstances, the translation work can be accredited by the translator without them holding the right over the work. Independent Translations If a translation is performed independently by the translator, the translator can even be identified as the co-author of the translation. Nevertheless, the author typically has the underlying copyright, restricting the translator’s right over the work. Creative Translations from the Public Domain In certain cases, a translation may be creative enough to warrant its own copyright. For example, a translator adapting a classic work or a book in the public domain into modern language may introduce enough originality to qualify for copyright protection. However, direct, word-for-word translations are typically not considered original enough to receive new copyright protection. What About Machine Translations? The Human Creativity Copyright Requirement Machine-generated translations, including those produced by platforms like OpenAI , operate through advanced algorithms that replicate language patterns rather than capture the human touch. Unlike translations crafted by human translators who often infuse cultural insight and genuine emotion into the work, OpenAI's output is rooted in statistical patterns and data. Consequently, while these translations are impressively efficient and accurate, they typically fall short of the originality required for copyright protection. This distinction underscores the human creativity requirement needed to secure a valid copyright . Ultimately, although machine-generated translations serve as powerful tools, they do not offer the same legal and creative protections as those provided by human translators. The Bottom Line: Navigating Copyright in Translations Translations occupy the middle ground under the law of the copyright. Albeit the right of the original author generally has the right under the copyright, the right under the copyright can also be claimed by the translator provided the translation is creative enough. Central considerations here include the creativity the translator has added, the nature of the work being translated, and whether the work is under the public domain. These considerations establish the right of the owner under the copyright for the translation. Why Wilson Whitaker Rynell for Your Copyright Work? At Wilson Whitaker Rynell, our professional lawyers specialize in the practice of copyright law and copyright litigation , including the complex subject matter of translation work. We can provide you with advice about the ownership of your work under the provisions of the copyright, and protect your creative property. If you are the author, the publisher, or the translator, you can rely upon the advice from our firm. Copyright Translation FAQS
A building with a sign that says law offices on it

Business Litigation Attorneys – Protecting Your Business in High-Stakes Legal Disputes

By John Wilson • February 12, 2025
Strategic Legal Representation for Complex Business Litigation
A woman wearing black and yellow boxing gloves is standing in a gym.

Female Divorce Attorneys in the Dallas-Fort Worth Area

By Leigh Whitaker • January 28, 2025
Female Divorce Attorneys in the Dallas-Fort Worth Area In many instances, divorce cases are challenging and emotionally taxing experiences. For this reason, it’s common for people to prefer working with an attorney of the same gender because they feel as though the attorney can empathize and understand their situation more. At the end of the day, the gender of your attorney may not affect the outcome of your case, but it’s important to feel as comfortable as possible while navigating through the process. At Wilson Whitaker Rynell, our experienced female divorce attorneys offer compassionate and empathetic approaches while they develop a comprehensive legal strategy to represent you. Why Should You Choose a Female Divorce Lawyer? There are many reasons why hiring a female divorce attorney can help you throughout your divorce. For one, they often have experience working on issues that disproportionately affect women in divorce such as spousal support (alimony), child custody disputes, and asset division. Additionally, female divorce lawyers offer a unique level of empathy, understanding, and communication. As a result, many clients feel that they are more approachable and compassionate, which is beneficial when dealing with the emotional turmoil of the process. More importantly, female divorce attorneys are more familiar with how the court treats women in divorce cases and use this knowledge to strategically protect their clients’ interests, whether male or female. Why Our Female Divorce Attorneys May be Right for You At Wilson Whitaker Rynell, our female divorce attorneys are skilled, knowledgeable professionals, they also have many years of experience in handling complex divorce cases. Whether it’s issues surrounding custody of children, alimony, or asset division, our female divorce lawyers ensure each client receives high-quality legal advice. Our firm’s female divorce attorneys provide the highest level of personal attention, ensuring that each client’s unique needs and concerns are addressed through every step. Unique Challenges Women Face in Family Law Disputes in Texas Family law disputes can be emotionally charged and legally complex, especially for women navigating the process in Texas. Women often encounter unique challenges due to their roles in the marriage and family dynamic, particularly when it comes to child custody, child support, and the division of marital assets. Child Custody Challenges In many marriages, women take on the primary caregiving role for their children. However, when it comes to custody decisions, courts in Texas prioritize the best interests of the child over parental gender. While this often works in favor of mothers, women may still face hurdles in proving they are better suited to provide the stable environment the child needs, especially if their ex-spouse disputes custody. Factors such as work schedules, living arrangements, and financial stability can come under scrutiny. Child Support Issues While Texas law allows women to seek child support, collecting these payments can sometimes prove difficult. Women awarded child support may find themselves dealing with ex-spouses who delay payments, make partial payments, or refuse to pay altogether. Enforcing child support orders often requires legal intervention, which can add to the emotional and financial strain. Division of Marital Assets In Texas, a community property state, marital assets are typically divided equitably during divorce. Women who are awarded assets such as the family home may face challenges related to maintaining the property, refinancing a mortgage, or covering associated expenses. Additionally, women who sacrificed their careers to support their spouses or raise children may feel disadvantaged during the division of assets if their earning potential is limited compared to their ex-spouse. How Your Divorce Attorney Will Support You Each divorce case is unique, and having an experienced attorney standing by you is vital. Whether you’re dividing assets, negotiating child custody, or managing other complex legal issues, the female divorce attorneys at Wilson Whitaker Rynell are here to protect the interests of you and your family. Our attorneys will take the time to understand your unique circumstances and empower you to make informed decisions that support your career, family and future. When you choose a female divorce attorney from Wilson Whitaker Rynell, you can trust that they will: Prioritize your family’s best interests. Negotiate with integrity, ensuring fairness and transparency. Clearly explain all your options and their potential outcomes. Help you create the future you want by offering trusted legal advice. Use efficient methods to minimize unnecessary costs and keep the process manageable. Navigating family law disputes requires a thorough understanding of Texas family law and strong advocacy. Women facing divorce or other family law issues are encouraged to seek an experienced family law attorney who can provide personalized guidance. A skilled lawyer can help craft a strategy that protects their rights and ensures a fair resolution. This includes representing their interests in court, negotiating settlements, and helping enforce orders such as child support or spousal maintenance.
A man riding a horse with a bull behind him

Wrangling Writs of Execution in Texas

By John Wilson • January 23, 2025
Understanding Writs of Execution in Texas: A Layperson’s Guide If a court determines that someone owes money to another party, the debtor—referred to as the "judgment debtor"—typically has 30 days to pay off the debt. If the debt remains unpaid after this time, the creditor, or "judgment creditor," can take legal action to enforce the payment through a Writ of Execution . This legal process, governed by Texas law, enables creditors to collect what they are owed by seizing and selling the debtor’s non-exempt assets. What Is a Writ of Execution? Under Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 629 , a Writ of Execution is a court order that authorizes a sheriff or constable to seize the debtor’s property to satisfy the debt. This writ is an essential tool for creditors when voluntary repayment has not occurred. Once the writ is issued, it is handed over to a county constable or sheriff, who is required to act “without delay” in collecting the debtor’s real and personal property. The seized property is then sold, and the proceeds are used to pay off the debt. If multiple writs are filed against the same debtor, the assets are distributed in the order the writs were received. What Property Can Be Seized Under a Writ of Execution? Texas law is very specific about which types of property can and cannot be seized to satisfy a judgment. Exempt Property Certain assets are protected from seizure under Texas Property Code § 41.001. These include: The debtor’s homestead (primary residence) Wages earned from employment Professionally prescribed health aids Workers’ compensation benefits College savings plans Some insurance benefits Personal property valued up to $50,000 for individuals and $100,000 for families Unique to Texas, the law also protects items like family Bibles, two firearms, pets, and for rural residents, livestock (e.g., 12 head of cattle and 120 fowl). This extensive list reflects Texas's cultural heritage and values. Non-Exempt Property Assets that are generally not exempt include: Vacation homes Timeshares Pleasure boats Airplanes Jewelry exceeding certain value thresholds The specific procedures for seizing different types of property are detailed in Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 639 . Can a Writ of Execution Be Avoided? Judgment debtors have a few options to avoid the execution of a writ: Filing a Supersedeas Bond A supersedeas bond can temporarily halt enforcement of the writ. This bond, filed with the county clerk or justice of the peace, preserves the status quo while the debtor seeks further legal remedies. This option is governed by Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 634 . Challenging the Execution Debtors can file a claim for wrongful execution in situations such as: The debt has already been paid Exempt property is being seized The levy is excessive Additionally, courts take extra care to protect property classified as a homestead under Texas Property Code § 41.002(c) . When only one spouse is responsible for the debt, Texas Family Code § 3.202(a) and related provisions provide guidance on levying against community or separate property. The Role of County Officials in Executing the Writ Once the writ is issued, its enforcement falls on county officials, typically a sheriff or constable. These officials must act in accordance with Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 34.072 , which requires them to execute the writ and report back to the court. They must: Give proper notice of the sale of seized property Ensure the proceeds are appropriately delivered to the creditor Avoid overstepping legal boundaries, such as seizing exempt property Failing to execute the writ properly can result in serious consequences, where a sheriff’s refusal to levy on a property initially listed as exempt (but later deemed abandoned) led to court action and damages awarded to the creditor. Preventing Fraudulent Transfers One challenge creditors face is when debtors attempt to hide or transfer assets to avoid collection. To address this, Texas follows the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act under Tex. Bus. & Comm. Code § 24.001 et seq .. This act provides legal remedies to creditors when a debtor’s transfer of assets is deemed fraudulent. Effect of a Defendant's Death on Writs of Execution Under Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 34.072 , the death of a defendant after a writ of execution is issued halts execution proceedings. However, any lien acquired from the writ's levy is still enforceable by the county court when paying off the deceased's debts. Why Proper Execution Of The Writ Is Crucial The rules for filing and serving a Writ of Execution are strict and detailed. Missteps, such as filing the writ in the wrong county, failing to serve the proper parties, or missing key deadlines, can lead to delays or even render the writ ineffective. Both creditors and debtors must ensure compliance with these rules to avoid unnecessary complications. For creditors, failure to properly enforce the writ could mean losing the opportunity to collect on a judgment. For debtors, not responding appropriately to a writ could result in the loss of valuable assets, even those that might have been exempt.
A sign that says jct 17 texas on it

The Intersection of Venue Selection & Motions to Dismiss in Texas

By John Wilson • January 17, 2025
Understanding Venue Selection and Motions to Dismiss in Texas Civil Litigation
Show More
The Wilson Legal Group are Dallas attorneys that specializes in Patents, Trademarks, Copyrights, Trade Secrets, Complex Litigation, Business/Corporate Law, Family Law and Real Estate Law. At the Wilson Legal Group, our clients are our focus. Our philosophy is simple and straight-forward: Understand our clients' needs, hopes, and interests in order to help them flourish. Our staff strives to build strong relationships with our clients in order to appreciate their best interests and help them achieve their goals.

Request A Blog?

Have an idea for a blog?  Click and request a blog and we will let you know when we post it!