a blue and orange check mark with the letter w on it as the Wilson Whitaker Rynell Logo

How to Overcome a Final Trademark Rejection

Chelsea Lankford • July 3, 2025

How to Overcome a Final Trademark Rejection: Your Guide to Saving Your Brand

A Final Office Action from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) can feel like a major roadblock for your trademark application. But don’t worry—it’s not the end of the line! With the right strategy, you can still protect your brand. This guide explains what a Final Office Action is, your options for responding to a trademark rejection, and how to choose the best path forward. Let’s dive in and explore how to overcome a USPTO trademark rejection.


What is a Final Office Action in the USPTO Trademark Process?

A Final Office Action is the USPTO’s way of saying they’re sticking to their decision to refuse your trademark application. It comes after you’ve responded to a Non-Final Office Action, but the examiner still believes there’s an issue, like a likelihood of confusion with another mark or incomplete documentation. This is their final stance—unless you take action to challenge it.

To keep your application alive, you can’t just repeat old arguments. Instead, you need to:

  • Offer new legal or factual arguments,
  • Submit fresh evidence or amend your application, or
  • Appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB).

If you don’t act by the deadline, your trademark application will be abandoned, leaving your brand unprotected. Working with a trademark attorney can help you navigate this process and increase your chances of success.


How Much Time Do You Have to Respond to a Trademark Rejection?

You have three months from the date of the Final Office Action to respond. Need more time? You can request a three-month extension for a fee, giving you up to six months total. Missing the deadline means your application will be abandoned, forcing you to either file a petition to revive or start over with a new application, which can be costly and time-consuming.


5 Options to Overcome a Final Office Action

Facing a trademark rejection? Here are five strategies to keep your application on track:


1. File a Request for Reconsideration

If you have new arguments, evidence, or changes to your application, a Request for Reconsideration lets you present them to the examiner. This isn’t about rehashing what you’ve already said. To succeed, you must:

  • Provide new facts or legal arguments,
  • Submit additional documentation, or
  • Amend your application to address the refusal (e.g., clarifying goods/services).

For example, if your rejection is based on a likelihood of confusion, you could argue that the other mark is weak, your products are unrelated, or marketplace factors make confusion unlikely. You might also negotiate a consent agreement with the owner of the conflicting mark to allow coexistence.


2. Appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)

If you believe the examiner’s decision is wrong but you don’t have new evidence, you can appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), the USPTO’s administrative board for trademark disputes. You must file a Notice of Appeal within three months of the Final Office Action. After that, you’ll have 60 days to submit a detailed appeal brief. Missing this deadline risks dismissal and abandonment of your application.

This option works best when you think the examiner misapplied trademark law or misinterpreted the facts.


Evidence plays a crucial role in getting a trademark refusal overturned on appeal. The right kind of evidence can make all the difference, especially when it’s tailored to the specific grounds for refusal. Depending on why your application was denied, you might consider including:

  • Documentation showing your trademark is used in a unique or distinctive way in the marketplace
  • Expert opinions that support your position and lend credibility to your argument
  • Historical records demonstrating acquired distinctiveness—proof that your mark has gained recognition through long-term use
  • Examples of similar registered trademarks to show consistency and fairness in trademark office decisions

Putting together strong, well-organized, and persuasive appeal evidence can significantly improve your chances of success. The more clearly you show how your trademark meets the legal requirements, the more compelling your case becomes.


3. Combine a Request for Reconsideration and TTAB Appeal

Why choose one when you can do both? Filing a Request for Reconsideration alongside a Notice of Appeal is a smart way to keep your options open. You can present new arguments or evidence to the examiner while preserving your right to appeal if they don’t budge. If the examiner accepts your reconsideration, your application may move forward, and the appeal is dismissed. If not, your appeal continues seamlessly. This dual approach is a popular strategy for overcoming trademark rejections.


  • What Happens When You File a Request for Reconsideration After a Trademark Refusal? Filing a Request for Reconsideration does not extend the deadline to file either a Notice of Appeal or a Petition to the Director. That means if you're serious about preserving your right to appeal, you must file the Notice of Appeal within the original three-month deadline—even if you’ve also submitted a request for reconsideration. If the USPTO denies your request for reconsideration and you haven’t filed an appeal in time, your trademark application will be considered abandoned due to an incomplete response.
  • What to Expect from the USPTO During Reconsideration: When the USPTO issues an Office Action in response to your reconsideration request, it should address any new evidence you've submitted. But even if you don’t submit new evidence, the Examining Attorney can still introduce additional evidence related to the issue under reconsideration. For more detail, refer to the Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP) §715.03.


Examiner Options When No Appeal Is Filed and No New Issues Are Raised in a Reconsideration

If your request for reconsideration doesn’t raise any new issues and you haven’t filed an appeal, the USPTO Examiner has a few options:

  1. Approve the mark for publication or registration if persuaded that the refusal has been overcome.
  2. Abandon the application if not convinced that the refusal has been resolved.
  3. Issue an Office Action denying the reconsideration, and note that although no appeal has been filed, there is still time left in the three-month appeal window.
  4. Issue another Office Action maintaining the refusal, but allow the applicant additional time to respond (a discretionary option under 37 C.F.R. §2.65(b)). This may come in the form of a 30-day letter, giving you extra time to address any outstanding issues.

If you're dealing with a final refusal and considering your next steps, it's essential to act promptly. Filing a reconsideration request alone won’t protect your right to appeal. To keep your application alive, make sure to file a Notice of Appeal within the three-month deadline, even if you're waiting on the outcome of your reconsideration request.


4. Challenge a Conflicting Trademark Registration

If your rejection is due to a conflict with an existing registered mark, you might be able to challenge it. Options include:

  • Filing a Petition to Cancel with the TTAB if the mark is over five years old and vulnerable (e.g., not in use),
  • Filing a Petition to Expunge or Reexamine if the mark was never used for the listed goods/services, or
  • Negotiating a coexistence agreement with the mark’s owner.

These are separate legal actions that can take time and resources but may clear the path for your trademark registration.


5. Let the Application Go Abandoned and Refile

Sometimes, starting over is the best move. Letting your application go abandoned and filing a new one might make sense if:

  • Your branding has changed,
  • You need to revise the goods/services in a way the current application doesn’t allow, or
  • A fresh start is cleaner.

Be cautious: if your rejection was for a likelihood of confusion, reapplying with the same mark and goods/services will likely face the same refusal unless the situation has changed.


How to Choose the Best Strategy for Your Trademark Rejection

The right path depends on why your application was rejected and what the USPTO will accept. Here’s a quick guide:

  • Have new evidence or arguments? File a Request for Reconsideration.
  • Think the examiner got it wrong? Appeal to the TTAB.
  • Want to cover all bases? Combine a Request for Reconsideration and TTAB Appeal.
  • Blocked by another mark? Consider cancellation, expungement, or a coexistence agreement.
  • Application no longer fits your needs? Let it go abandoned and refile.

A trademark attorney can help you evaluate your options and craft a response tailored to the USPTO’s concerns.


Why Acting Fast is Critical for Your Trademark

Time is ticking when you receive a Final Office Action. Missing the three-month deadline (or six months with an extension) means your application will be abandoned, potentially costing you your brand’s protection. Acting quickly preserves your options and avoids extra expenses or delays.


Final Trademark Rejection FAQs

  • Why Was My Trademark Application Rejected by the USPTO?

    The USPTO may reject a trademark application for several reasons. Common grounds include a likelihood of confusion with an existing registered mark, the mark being too descriptive or generic, or the mark failing to function as a trademark. If your application is refused, the examining attorney will issue a non-final Office Action explaining the specific reasons.

  • Can I Still Use a Trademark That Was Rejected?

    Yes, you can still use a trademark in commerce even if it was rejected by the USPTO. However, using an unregistered trademark comes with legal risks. Without a federal registration, you won’t benefit from the legal presumptions of ownership and nationwide exclusivity, and others may challenge your rights—especially if they hold a registered mark.

  • What Are My Options If My Trademark Application Is Refused?

    If your trademark is refused, you have four main options:


    1. Negotiate co-existence with the owner of a conflicting mark
    2. Submit a request for reconsideration with new evidence or arguments
    3. File an appeal with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)
    4. Submit a new trademark application using a revised or entirely different mark
  • How Does a Co-Existence Agreement Help Overcome a Trademark Refusal?

    If your application is rejected due to a conflict with another trademark, you may negotiate a co-existence agreement or consent-to-use agreement with the other party. If successful, submitting this agreement to the USPTO may persuade the examining attorney to withdraw the refusal—though it’s not guaranteed. Keep in mind, these agreements can limit how you use your trademark and may come with legal risks.

  • What Is a Request for Reconsideration and When Should I File One?

    A request for reconsideration is filed after receiving a final Office Action. You submit it directly to the examining attorney, along with new arguments or evidence supporting your trademark. This can be filed alone or with an appeal. It gives the examiner a chance to review and potentially reverse their decision without going through the appeals process.

  • What Happens If I File an Appeal With the TTAB?

    Filing an appeal with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) allows a panel to review whether the examining attorney’s decision was correct. This is a more formal legal process than a request for reconsideration and can be pursued simultaneously or instead of that option.

  • Should I Rebrand and File a New Trademark Application?

    Sometimes, it makes sense to create a new mark and submit a fresh application—especially if the refusal is difficult to overcome. However, rebranding can be expensive. You may need to change your logo, product packaging, website, marketing materials, and possibly state filings. It’s important to weigh the costs and benefits before making this decision.

Trademark Solutions For You | Wilson Legal Group

Looking for Top Trademark Representation in the Dallas, Houston or Austin? Contact Wilson Legal Group!

At Wilson Legal Group, we are dedicated to providing exceptional trademark filing,
trademark reconsideration, and trademark appeal services.


Need help with trademark litigation, resolving trademark disputes, or securing trademark ?

Our experienced attorneys are here to deliver results!


Contact Us or Call 972-248-8080 for a Free Consultation!


Person placing a red house on a Monopoly board with other houses.
By John Wilson August 13, 2025
Owelty of partition in Texas: keep the home, pay out equity. Understand documents, refinancing, title priority, releases, and risks before you act.
Person signing a document with a fountain pen. The word
By John Wilson August 8, 2025
Learn how Texas law allows you to challenge divorce property agreements based on mental incapacity, duress, or undue influence. Discover the legal standards, case examples, and how to protect your rights under Texas contract law.
Cowboy in a suit and hat carrying a rifle, standing outdoors against a rocky backdrop.
By John Wilson August 5, 2025
Unjust Enrichment in Texas—Overview
A little girl is sitting at a table blowing bubbles while a man takes a picture of her.
By John Wilson July 23, 2025
Can a Parent Record a Child’s Phone Calls in Texas?
A model house , keys , coins and money on a table.
By John Wilson June 19, 2025
Civil Asset Forfeiture in Texas: How Your Company Could Be at Risk—and How a Law Firm Can Help
A bartender is pouring whiskey into a glass at a bar.
By John Wilson May 6, 2025
TABC Administrative Proceedings in Texas 
Man kissing pregnant belly.
By Chelsea Lankford April 10, 2025
Texas Senate Passes Bill Requiring Retroactive Child Support from Date of Conception
A person is holding a cell phone in front of a book titled artificial intelligence
By John Wilson February 19, 2025
Copyright and Translated Content: Who Owns the Creative Rights? Understanding Copyright Law and Translation Copyright law protects creative work and bestows sole authority over the work upon the creators. For example, the owner of the work of a novel has the right over the work under the concept of the right under the copyright. Courts have found that “the degree of protection afforded by the copyright is measured by what is actually copyrightable in the publication and not by the entire publication.” See, e.g., Dorsey v. Old Sur. Life Ins. Co., 98 F.2d 872, 873 (10th Cir. 1938) (emphasis added). For translations, the situation is not very clear. Translations involve creative judgments over word translation and not the translation of mere words. Hence the knowledge about the applicability of the concept of the right over the work is essential for establishing the right over the work. For example, a Court in the Northern District of California stated that: “ the determinative question is whether Plaintiff holds a valid copyright. ” Signo Trading Intern. Ltd. v. Gordon, 535 F. Supp. 362, 363 (N.D. Cal. 1981). The Signo Trading Court dismissed Plaintiff’s infringement claims because plaintiff did not have a valid copyright as a matter of law in the translations and transliterations at issue because they lacked the “requisite originality.” Id. at 365. Can Translation Be Considered a Creative Process? The Practice of Translating Translation goes beyond the replacement of one word by the equivalent word from the source text. Translating literary work, poetry, and fiction with deeper meanings beyond the surface text is a complex, artistic process. Translating books like The Iliad, for instance, requires the practice of artistic translation to translate the emotions, thoughts, and the culture correctly. Technical Translations and Legal Translations Conversely, technical writing and texts for the law need less creativity and instead value correctness over all else. These writing forms require strict adherence to the original sense, leaving very little room for artistic interpretation. Translations for these writing forms thus typically involve less creative contribution and less potential for the work being protected by copyright. Why Is Creativity Important for Translations for Copyright? Originality when translating For a work to be subject to copyright, some creativity, however slight, is essential. Even when the translation is taken from the work, the translation also includes some creative work by the translator. This creativity can make the translation subject to copyright. A derivative work must “recast, transform[], or adapt[]” a preexisting work and “consist[] of editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship.” Id. In other words, it must change or alter the pre-existing work’s content and must itself be an original work of authorship. The Supreme Court stated that “ [t]he sine qua non of copyright is originality ” and that “ [t]o qualify for copyright protection, a work must be original to the author. ” Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., Inc., 499 U.S. 340, 361 (1991) at 345. “Original, as the term is used in copyright, means only that the work was independently created by the author (as opposed to copied from other works), and that it possesses at least some minimal degree of creativity.” Id. (citing 1 M. Nimmer & D. Nimmer, Copyright §§ 2.01[A], [B] (1990)). In granting a Rule 12 motion to dismiss, the Signo Trading Court held that: " It is inconceivable that anyone could copyright a single word or a commonly used short phrase, in any language. It is also inconceivable that a valid copyright could be obtained for a phonetic spelling, using standard Roman letters, of such words or phrases. Although lists of words and translations of larger works may be copyrightable, Plaintiff cannot claim credit for any of the elements which make those things copyrightable. For these reasons, Plaintiff does not hold a valid copyright on the translations or transliterations ... " Signo Trading, 535 F. Supp. at 365. The Problem of the Derivative Work However, translations are generally "derivative works" - derived from the work of another. Because of this, the owner or author of the work is generally required to agree to the translation. Translations made illegally can be held under the classification of copyright violations, even when the translator has added creative elements. Who Has the Right over the Translated Work? Employer-Commissioned Translations Ownership of the copyright for the translation work varies. If the translation is commissioned by the owner of the original work, the owner will retain the right. Even when the translator adds creativity by passing over the original emotions and thoughts, the owner will not necessarily lose the right over the translation work. In some circumstances, the translation work can be accredited by the translator without them holding the right over the work. Independent Translations If a translation is performed independently by the translator, the translator can even be identified as the co-author of the translation. Nevertheless, the author typically has the underlying copyright, restricting the translator’s right over the work. Creative Translations from the Public Domain In certain cases, a translation may be creative enough to warrant its own copyright. For example, a translator adapting a classic work or a book in the public domain into modern language may introduce enough originality to qualify for copyright protection. However, direct, word-for-word translations are typically not considered original enough to receive new copyright protection. What About Machine Translations? The Human Creativity Copyright Requirement Machine-generated translations, including those produced by platforms like OpenAI , operate through advanced algorithms that replicate language patterns rather than capture the human touch. Unlike translations crafted by human translators who often infuse cultural insight and genuine emotion into the work, OpenAI's output is rooted in statistical patterns and data. Consequently, while these translations are impressively efficient and accurate, they typically fall short of the originality required for copyright protection. This distinction underscores the human creativity requirement needed to secure a valid copyright . Ultimately, although machine-generated translations serve as powerful tools, they do not offer the same legal and creative protections as those provided by human translators. The Bottom Line: Navigating Copyright in Translations Translations occupy the middle ground under the law of the copyright. Albeit the right of the original author generally has the right under the copyright, the right under the copyright can also be claimed by the translator provided the translation is creative enough. Central considerations here include the creativity the translator has added, the nature of the work being translated, and whether the work is under the public domain. These considerations establish the right of the owner under the copyright for the translation. Why Wilson Whitaker Rynell for Your Copyright Work? At Wilson Whitaker Rynell, our professional lawyers specialize in the practice of copyright law and copyright litigation , including the complex subject matter of translation work. We can provide you with advice about the ownership of your work under the provisions of the copyright, and protect your creative property. If you are the author, the publisher, or the translator, you can rely upon the advice from our firm. Copyright Translation FAQS
A building with a sign that says law offices on it
By John Wilson February 12, 2025
Strategic Legal Representation for Complex Business Litigation
Show More
The Wilson Legal Group are Dallas attorneys that specializes in Patents, Trademarks, Copyrights, Trade Secrets, Complex Litigation, Business/Corporate Law, Family Law and Real Estate Law. At the Wilson Legal Group, our clients are our focus. Our philosophy is simple and straight-forward: Understand our clients' needs, hopes, and interests in order to help them flourish. Our staff strives to build strong relationships with our clients in order to appreciate their best interests and help them achieve their goals.

Request A Blog?

Have an idea for a blog?  Click and request a blog and we will let you know when we post it!