a blue and orange check mark with the letter w on it as the Wilson Whitaker Rynell Logo

Unjust Enrichment in Texas: When Fairness Demands Restitution

John Wilson • August 5, 2025

Unjust Enrichment in Texas—Overview

At Wilson Whitaker Rynell, we understand that not every legal dispute arises from a signed contract. Sometimes, fairness itself demands a remedy. That’s where the doctrine of unjust enrichment comes into play. If you’ve provided a benefit to someone who hasn’t compensated you—and no formal agreement exists—Texas law may entitle you to restitution.

What Is Unjust Enrichment?

Unjust enrichment is a legal principle designed to prevent one party from unfairly profiting at another’s expense. It typically arises when Party A confers a benefit on Party B, but Party B fails to provide compensation or restitution. This situation often occurs in informal arrangements, mistaken transactions, or scenarios where services or goods are delivered without a formal agreement. Texas courts recognize unjust enrichment as an equitable remedy, meaning it’s grounded in fairness rather than strict legal rules. The goal is to restore balance—not to punish. If someone receives a benefit they didn’t earn or pay for, and the provider suffers a loss, the law may step in to correct the imbalance.


This doctrine of unjust environment is especially important in today’s fast-paced business environment, where verbal agreements, informal collaborations, and digital transactions are common. When contracts are missing or unclear, unjust enrichment ensures that justice isn’t left behind.


When Contracts Just Don’t Cut It

Texas law is clear: unjust enrichment only applies when no valid contract exists between the parties. If a written or implied agreement governs the relationship, courts will enforce that contract. But when there’s no agreement—and one party has clearly benefited—the law may impose a quasi-contract to ensure restitution.


A quasi-contract isn’t a real contract. It’s a legal construct that allows courts to treat the situation as if a contract existed, solely to prevent unjust outcomes. This approach reflects the court’s commitment to equity and fairness, especially when traditional legal remedies fall short. Quantum meruit is an equitable remedy which does not arise out of a contract but is independent of it. Vortt Exploration Co. v. Chevron USA, Inc., 787 S.W.2d 942, 944 (Tex.1990). Generally, a party may recover under quantum meruit only when no express contract covering the services or materials furnished exists. Truly v.

Austin, 744 S.W.2d 934, 936 (Tex. 1988).


Example: Vortt Exploration Co., Inc. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 787 S.W.2d 942 (Tex. 1990).


Facts: Vortt Exploration Company negotiated with Chevron to lease certain mineral rights. Believing it had an agreement or that one was imminent, Vortt performed extensive work (including geophysical and geological analysis) that directly benefited Chevron. Ultimately, Chevron never executed a contract with Vortt and instead entered into leases with other parties, but still used the benefits of Vortt’s work.


Legal Issue: There was no enforceable contract between Vortt and Chevron. Vortt sued under quantum meruit, a form of recovery under unjust enrichment.


Holding: The Texas Supreme Court held that even in the absence of a contract, a party may recover in quantum meruit if:

  1. Valuable services or materials were furnished;
  2. They were accepted by the party sought to be charged;
  3. The services or materials were not given gratuitously;
  4. The party providing them expected compensation.


The Court found that Chevron knowingly accepted the benefit of Vortt’s work and would be unjustly enriched if allowed to retain the benefits without paying.

Elements of an Unjust Enrichment Claim in Texas

To succeed in an unjust enrichment claim, Texas law requires proof of three key elements:

  • The defendant received a benefit.
  • The benefit was conferred at the plaintiff’s expense.
  • No contract exists between the parties.

These elements form the foundation of a quasi-contractual obligation, where the court imposes a duty to repay or return the benefit. The focus isn’t on wrongdoing—it’s on fairness. If someone gains through another’s efforts or resources, and there’s no legal justification, restitution may be required.

Courts carefully examine the facts to determine whether the enrichment was truly unjust. They consider whether the benefit was accepted knowingly, whether the provider expected compensation, and whether the recipient acted in good faith. These nuances make legal guidance essential in unjust enrichment cases.

Quantum Meruit: A Close Cousin of Unjust Enrichment

Closely related to unjust enrichment is the doctrine of quantum meruit, which translates to “as much as he has deserved.” This principle applies when someone provides services or benefits with a reasonable expectation of payment, even though no formal agreement exists.

Quantum meruit is often used in construction, consulting, and service industries, where work begins before contracts are finalized. If you’ve invested time, labor, or resources expecting compensation—and the other party benefited—quantum meruit may entitle you to payment.


The key distinction between quantum meruit and unjust enrichment lies in the expectation of compensation. Quantum meruit focuses on the provider’s reasonable belief that they would be paid. Unjust enrichment, on the other hand, centers on the unfair gain of the recipient. Both doctrines serve the same purpose: ensuring that equity prevails when contracts are missing.


Not Fraud—Just Unfair Gain

It’s important to understand that unjust enrichment doesn’t require fraud, deception, or bad intent. Many cases arise from honest mistakes, miscommunications, or unintended actions. For example, someone may receive a payment in error or accept goods they didn’t order.

Texas law doesn’t punish these recipients—but it does require them to act fairly. If they knowingly retain a benefit they didn’t earn or pay for, they may be required to return it or compensate the provider. This approach reflects the legal system’s commitment to justice, even in the absence of wrongdoing.

Unjust enrichment is about restoring balance—not assigning blame. It ensures that benefits are accompanied by deservedness, and that no one profits from another’s disadvantage.

What Damages Can Be Recovered in Unjust Enrichment?

In unjust enrichment cases, Texas courts focus on the gain of the receiving party, not the loss of the provider. This means restitution is based on the value of the benefit received—not necessarily the cost incurred by the provider.

Damages may include:

  • Return of the benefit (e.g., the return of mineral rights).
  • Monetary compensation equal to the fair market value of the benefit.

This approach ensures that the enriched party doesn’t retain an unfair advantage, and the provider receives just compensation. It also reinforces the principle that equity demands fairness—not windfalls.

FAQs About Unjust Enrichment and Quantum Meruit in Texas

  • What is unjust enrichment under Texas law?

    Unjust enrichment occurs when one party unfairly benefits at another’s expense without legal justification. Texas courts recognize this as an equitable remedy that applies when no valid contract exists between the parties. If someone accepts goods or services without paying, and the provider suffers a loss, the law may require restitution.

  • Can I sue for unjust enrichment if there was no written contract?

    Yes. In Texas, you may bring an unjust enrichment or quantum meruit claim if no valid contract governs the transaction. Courts may impose a quasi-contract to ensure fairness and prevent unjust gain, even if the arrangement was informal or based on verbal communication.

  • What is the difference between unjust enrichment and quantum meruit in Texas?

    • Unjust enrichment focuses on the recipient's gain and whether they unfairly benefited.

    • Quantum meruit centers on the provider's expectation of payment for services rendered.

    Both remedies apply when there’s no enforceable contract but a clear benefit was provided and accepted.

  • What are the elements of an unjust enrichment claim in Texas?

    To prove unjust enrichment, you must show:


    • The defendant received a benefit;

    • The benefit was conferred at the plaintiff’s expense;

    • No enforceable contract exists between the parties.

    Texas courts will examine the facts to determine if the enrichment was truly unjust.

  • What damages can be recovered in an unjust enrichment case in Texas?

    Texas courts award damages based on the value of the benefit received, not the cost to the provider. Remedies may include:


    • Return of goods or property;

    • Monetary compensation equal to the fair market value of the benefit.

    The goal is to prevent an unfair windfall to the receiving party.



  • Can I file a quantum meruit claim if I started work before a contract was signed?

    Yes. In industries like construction and consulting, it's common to begin work before a contract is finalized. If you reasonably expected to be paid, and the other party accepted the benefit, Texas law allows recovery under quantum meruit for the value of your services.

  • How do I prove unjust enrichment or quantum meruit in a Texas court?

    Evidence should include:


    • Proof that valuable goods or services were provided;

    • Documentation or testimony showing they were accepted;

    • Evidence that the services were not gratuitous;

    • Demonstration that you expected compensation.

    Legal representation can strengthen your case, especially in complex business disputes.

Wilson Whitaker Rynell | Top Business Litigation Attorneys in Dallas, Houston & Austin


Need experienced business litigation lawyers in Texas?


At Wilson Whitaker Rynell, we offer strategic and aggressive legal representation for businesses across Dallas, Houston, and Austin.

Whether you're seeking to prevent business disputes or are currently involved in complex commercial litigation, our team of attorneys delivers business-savvy, results-driven counsel. We understand the stakes—your company, your reputation, and your bottom line.


Why Choose Wilson Whitaker Rynell for Business Litigation?


  • Board-certified and experienced litigation attorneys
  • Deep knowledge of Texas business law
  • Proven track record in commercial disputes
  • Personalized strategies tailored to your company’s goals


Contact Wilson Whitaker Rynell Today or Call 972-248-8080 for a Free Consultation!



A little girl is sitting at a table blowing bubbles while a man takes a picture of her.

Can a Parent Record a Child’s Phone Calls in Texas?

By John Wilson • July 23, 2025
Can a Parent Record a Child’s Phone Calls in Texas?
A person is holding up their hands with the words yes and no written on them.

How to Overcome a Final Trademark Rejection

By Chelsea Lankford • July 3, 2025
How to Overcome a Final Trademark Rejection: Your Guide to Saving Your Brand
A model house , keys , coins and money on a table.

Civil Asset Forfeiture in Texas

By John Wilson • June 19, 2025
Civil Asset Forfeiture in Texas: How Your Company Could Be at Risk—and How a Law Firm Can Help
A bartender is pouring whiskey into a glass at a bar.

Navigating Texas TABC Administrative Proceedings

By John Wilson • May 6, 2025
TABC Administrative Proceedings in Texas 
Man kissing pregnant belly.

Texas Senate Passes Bill Requiring Retroactive Child Support from Date of Conception

By Chelsea Lankford • April 10, 2025
Texas Senate Passes Bill Requiring Retroactive Child Support from Date of Conception
A person is holding a cell phone in front of a book titled artificial intelligence

Copyright and Translated Content: Who Owns the Creative Rights?

By John Wilson • February 19, 2025
Copyright and Translated Content: Who Owns the Creative Rights? Understanding Copyright Law and Translation Copyright law protects creative work and bestows sole authority over the work upon the creators. For example, the owner of the work of a novel has the right over the work under the concept of the right under the copyright. Courts have found that “the degree of protection afforded by the copyright is measured by what is actually copyrightable in the publication and not by the entire publication.” See, e.g., Dorsey v. Old Sur. Life Ins. Co., 98 F.2d 872, 873 (10th Cir. 1938) (emphasis added). For translations, the situation is not very clear. Translations involve creative judgments over word translation and not the translation of mere words. Hence the knowledge about the applicability of the concept of the right over the work is essential for establishing the right over the work. For example, a Court in the Northern District of California stated that: “ the determinative question is whether Plaintiff holds a valid copyright. ” Signo Trading Intern. Ltd. v. Gordon, 535 F. Supp. 362, 363 (N.D. Cal. 1981). The Signo Trading Court dismissed Plaintiff’s infringement claims because plaintiff did not have a valid copyright as a matter of law in the translations and transliterations at issue because they lacked the “requisite originality.” Id. at 365. Can Translation Be Considered a Creative Process? The Practice of Translating Translation goes beyond the replacement of one word by the equivalent word from the source text. Translating literary work, poetry, and fiction with deeper meanings beyond the surface text is a complex, artistic process. Translating books like The Iliad, for instance, requires the practice of artistic translation to translate the emotions, thoughts, and the culture correctly. Technical Translations and Legal Translations Conversely, technical writing and texts for the law need less creativity and instead value correctness over all else. These writing forms require strict adherence to the original sense, leaving very little room for artistic interpretation. Translations for these writing forms thus typically involve less creative contribution and less potential for the work being protected by copyright. Why Is Creativity Important for Translations for Copyright? Originality when translating For a work to be subject to copyright, some creativity, however slight, is essential. Even when the translation is taken from the work, the translation also includes some creative work by the translator. This creativity can make the translation subject to copyright. A derivative work must “recast, transform[], or adapt[]” a preexisting work and “consist[] of editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship.” Id. In other words, it must change or alter the pre-existing work’s content and must itself be an original work of authorship. The Supreme Court stated that “ [t]he sine qua non of copyright is originality ” and that “ [t]o qualify for copyright protection, a work must be original to the author. ” Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., Inc., 499 U.S. 340, 361 (1991) at 345. “Original, as the term is used in copyright, means only that the work was independently created by the author (as opposed to copied from other works), and that it possesses at least some minimal degree of creativity.” Id. (citing 1 M. Nimmer & D. Nimmer, Copyright §§ 2.01[A], [B] (1990)). In granting a Rule 12 motion to dismiss, the Signo Trading Court held that: " It is inconceivable that anyone could copyright a single word or a commonly used short phrase, in any language. It is also inconceivable that a valid copyright could be obtained for a phonetic spelling, using standard Roman letters, of such words or phrases. Although lists of words and translations of larger works may be copyrightable, Plaintiff cannot claim credit for any of the elements which make those things copyrightable. For these reasons, Plaintiff does not hold a valid copyright on the translations or transliterations ... " Signo Trading, 535 F. Supp. at 365. The Problem of the Derivative Work However, translations are generally "derivative works" - derived from the work of another. Because of this, the owner or author of the work is generally required to agree to the translation. Translations made illegally can be held under the classification of copyright violations, even when the translator has added creative elements. Who Has the Right over the Translated Work? Employer-Commissioned Translations Ownership of the copyright for the translation work varies. If the translation is commissioned by the owner of the original work, the owner will retain the right. Even when the translator adds creativity by passing over the original emotions and thoughts, the owner will not necessarily lose the right over the translation work. In some circumstances, the translation work can be accredited by the translator without them holding the right over the work. Independent Translations If a translation is performed independently by the translator, the translator can even be identified as the co-author of the translation. Nevertheless, the author typically has the underlying copyright, restricting the translator’s right over the work. Creative Translations from the Public Domain In certain cases, a translation may be creative enough to warrant its own copyright. For example, a translator adapting a classic work or a book in the public domain into modern language may introduce enough originality to qualify for copyright protection. However, direct, word-for-word translations are typically not considered original enough to receive new copyright protection. What About Machine Translations? The Human Creativity Copyright Requirement Machine-generated translations, including those produced by platforms like OpenAI , operate through advanced algorithms that replicate language patterns rather than capture the human touch. Unlike translations crafted by human translators who often infuse cultural insight and genuine emotion into the work, OpenAI's output is rooted in statistical patterns and data. Consequently, while these translations are impressively efficient and accurate, they typically fall short of the originality required for copyright protection. This distinction underscores the human creativity requirement needed to secure a valid copyright . Ultimately, although machine-generated translations serve as powerful tools, they do not offer the same legal and creative protections as those provided by human translators. The Bottom Line: Navigating Copyright in Translations Translations occupy the middle ground under the law of the copyright. Albeit the right of the original author generally has the right under the copyright, the right under the copyright can also be claimed by the translator provided the translation is creative enough. Central considerations here include the creativity the translator has added, the nature of the work being translated, and whether the work is under the public domain. These considerations establish the right of the owner under the copyright for the translation. Why Wilson Whitaker Rynell for Your Copyright Work? At Wilson Whitaker Rynell, our professional lawyers specialize in the practice of copyright law and copyright litigation , including the complex subject matter of translation work. We can provide you with advice about the ownership of your work under the provisions of the copyright, and protect your creative property. If you are the author, the publisher, or the translator, you can rely upon the advice from our firm. Copyright Translation FAQS
A building with a sign that says law offices on it

Business Litigation Attorneys – Protecting Your Business in High-Stakes Legal Disputes

By John Wilson • February 12, 2025
Strategic Legal Representation for Complex Business Litigation
A woman wearing black and yellow boxing gloves is standing in a gym.

Female Divorce Attorneys in the Dallas-Fort Worth Area

By Leigh Whitaker • January 28, 2025
Female Divorce Attorneys in the Dallas-Fort Worth Area In many instances, divorce cases are challenging and emotionally taxing experiences. For this reason, it’s common for people to prefer working with an attorney of the same gender because they feel as though the attorney can empathize and understand their situation more. At the end of the day, the gender of your attorney may not affect the outcome of your case, but it’s important to feel as comfortable as possible while navigating through the process. At Wilson Whitaker Rynell, our experienced female divorce attorneys offer compassionate and empathetic approaches while they develop a comprehensive legal strategy to represent you. Why Should You Choose a Female Divorce Lawyer? There are many reasons why hiring a female divorce attorney can help you throughout your divorce. For one, they often have experience working on issues that disproportionately affect women in divorce such as spousal support (alimony), child custody disputes, and asset division. Additionally, female divorce lawyers offer a unique level of empathy, understanding, and communication. As a result, many clients feel that they are more approachable and compassionate, which is beneficial when dealing with the emotional turmoil of the process. More importantly, female divorce attorneys are more familiar with how the court treats women in divorce cases and use this knowledge to strategically protect their clients’ interests, whether male or female. Why Our Female Divorce Attorneys May be Right for You At Wilson Whitaker Rynell, our female divorce attorneys are skilled, knowledgeable professionals, they also have many years of experience in handling complex divorce cases. Whether it’s issues surrounding custody of children, alimony, or asset division, our female divorce lawyers ensure each client receives high-quality legal advice. Our firm’s female divorce attorneys provide the highest level of personal attention, ensuring that each client’s unique needs and concerns are addressed through every step. Unique Challenges Women Face in Family Law Disputes in Texas Family law disputes can be emotionally charged and legally complex, especially for women navigating the process in Texas. Women often encounter unique challenges due to their roles in the marriage and family dynamic, particularly when it comes to child custody, child support, and the division of marital assets. Child Custody Challenges In many marriages, women take on the primary caregiving role for their children. However, when it comes to custody decisions, courts in Texas prioritize the best interests of the child over parental gender. While this often works in favor of mothers, women may still face hurdles in proving they are better suited to provide the stable environment the child needs, especially if their ex-spouse disputes custody. Factors such as work schedules, living arrangements, and financial stability can come under scrutiny. Child Support Issues While Texas law allows women to seek child support, collecting these payments can sometimes prove difficult. Women awarded child support may find themselves dealing with ex-spouses who delay payments, make partial payments, or refuse to pay altogether. Enforcing child support orders often requires legal intervention, which can add to the emotional and financial strain. Division of Marital Assets In Texas, a community property state, marital assets are typically divided equitably during divorce. Women who are awarded assets such as the family home may face challenges related to maintaining the property, refinancing a mortgage, or covering associated expenses. Additionally, women who sacrificed their careers to support their spouses or raise children may feel disadvantaged during the division of assets if their earning potential is limited compared to their ex-spouse. How Your Divorce Attorney Will Support You Each divorce case is unique, and having an experienced attorney standing by you is vital. Whether you’re dividing assets, negotiating child custody, or managing other complex legal issues, the female divorce attorneys at Wilson Whitaker Rynell are here to protect the interests of you and your family. Our attorneys will take the time to understand your unique circumstances and empower you to make informed decisions that support your career, family and future. When you choose a female divorce attorney from Wilson Whitaker Rynell, you can trust that they will: Prioritize your family’s best interests. Negotiate with integrity, ensuring fairness and transparency. Clearly explain all your options and their potential outcomes. Help you create the future you want by offering trusted legal advice. Use efficient methods to minimize unnecessary costs and keep the process manageable. Navigating family law disputes requires a thorough understanding of Texas family law and strong advocacy. Women facing divorce or other family law issues are encouraged to seek an experienced family law attorney who can provide personalized guidance. A skilled lawyer can help craft a strategy that protects their rights and ensures a fair resolution. This includes representing their interests in court, negotiating settlements, and helping enforce orders such as child support or spousal maintenance.
A man riding a horse with a bull behind him

Wrangling Writs of Execution in Texas

By John Wilson • January 23, 2025
Understanding Writs of Execution in Texas: A Layperson’s Guide If a court determines that someone owes money to another party, the debtor—referred to as the "judgment debtor"—typically has 30 days to pay off the debt. If the debt remains unpaid after this time, the creditor, or "judgment creditor," can take legal action to enforce the payment through a Writ of Execution . This legal process, governed by Texas law, enables creditors to collect what they are owed by seizing and selling the debtor’s non-exempt assets. What Is a Writ of Execution? Under Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 629 , a Writ of Execution is a court order that authorizes a sheriff or constable to seize the debtor’s property to satisfy the debt. This writ is an essential tool for creditors when voluntary repayment has not occurred. Once the writ is issued, it is handed over to a county constable or sheriff, who is required to act “without delay” in collecting the debtor’s real and personal property. The seized property is then sold, and the proceeds are used to pay off the debt. If multiple writs are filed against the same debtor, the assets are distributed in the order the writs were received. What Property Can Be Seized Under a Writ of Execution? Texas law is very specific about which types of property can and cannot be seized to satisfy a judgment. Exempt Property Certain assets are protected from seizure under Texas Property Code § 41.001. These include: The debtor’s homestead (primary residence) Wages earned from employment Professionally prescribed health aids Workers’ compensation benefits College savings plans Some insurance benefits Personal property valued up to $50,000 for individuals and $100,000 for families Unique to Texas, the law also protects items like family Bibles, two firearms, pets, and for rural residents, livestock (e.g., 12 head of cattle and 120 fowl). This extensive list reflects Texas's cultural heritage and values. Non-Exempt Property Assets that are generally not exempt include: Vacation homes Timeshares Pleasure boats Airplanes Jewelry exceeding certain value thresholds The specific procedures for seizing different types of property are detailed in Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 639 . Can a Writ of Execution Be Avoided? Judgment debtors have a few options to avoid the execution of a writ: Filing a Supersedeas Bond A supersedeas bond can temporarily halt enforcement of the writ. This bond, filed with the county clerk or justice of the peace, preserves the status quo while the debtor seeks further legal remedies. This option is governed by Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 634 . Challenging the Execution Debtors can file a claim for wrongful execution in situations such as: The debt has already been paid Exempt property is being seized The levy is excessive Additionally, courts take extra care to protect property classified as a homestead under Texas Property Code § 41.002(c) . When only one spouse is responsible for the debt, Texas Family Code § 3.202(a) and related provisions provide guidance on levying against community or separate property. The Role of County Officials in Executing the Writ Once the writ is issued, its enforcement falls on county officials, typically a sheriff or constable. These officials must act in accordance with Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 34.072 , which requires them to execute the writ and report back to the court. They must: Give proper notice of the sale of seized property Ensure the proceeds are appropriately delivered to the creditor Avoid overstepping legal boundaries, such as seizing exempt property Failing to execute the writ properly can result in serious consequences, where a sheriff’s refusal to levy on a property initially listed as exempt (but later deemed abandoned) led to court action and damages awarded to the creditor. Preventing Fraudulent Transfers One challenge creditors face is when debtors attempt to hide or transfer assets to avoid collection. To address this, Texas follows the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act under Tex. Bus. & Comm. Code § 24.001 et seq .. This act provides legal remedies to creditors when a debtor’s transfer of assets is deemed fraudulent. Effect of a Defendant's Death on Writs of Execution Under Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 34.072 , the death of a defendant after a writ of execution is issued halts execution proceedings. However, any lien acquired from the writ's levy is still enforceable by the county court when paying off the deceased's debts. Why Proper Execution Of The Writ Is Crucial The rules for filing and serving a Writ of Execution are strict and detailed. Missteps, such as filing the writ in the wrong county, failing to serve the proper parties, or missing key deadlines, can lead to delays or even render the writ ineffective. Both creditors and debtors must ensure compliance with these rules to avoid unnecessary complications. For creditors, failure to properly enforce the writ could mean losing the opportunity to collect on a judgment. For debtors, not responding appropriately to a writ could result in the loss of valuable assets, even those that might have been exempt.
Show More
The Wilson Legal Group are Dallas attorneys that specializes in Patents, Trademarks, Copyrights, Trade Secrets, Complex Litigation, Business/Corporate Law, Family Law and Real Estate Law. At the Wilson Legal Group, our clients are our focus. Our philosophy is simple and straight-forward: Understand our clients' needs, hopes, and interests in order to help them flourish. Our staff strives to build strong relationships with our clients in order to appreciate their best interests and help them achieve their goals.

Request A Blog?

Have an idea for a blog?  Click and request a blog and we will let you know when we post it!